Isomorphisms
An important concept when working with graphs is called isomorphism. To motivate this concept, let us consider the following example.
Although the first and second graphs look very different in drawing (the first is drawn so that edges cross as little as possible), a careful look would reveal that they are practically the same graph. Sometimes, two graphs may appear different in the names of vertices, but then their structures are the same. This "sameness" of structures is captured by the notion of isomorphism.
Two graphs and are isomorphic if there exists a bijection such that
holds for every . When and are isomorphic, we write . We say that is an isomorphism between and .
In Figure 6, three isomorphic graphs are shown. Define the appropriate bijections between them.
Prove that defines an equivalence relation on the set of all -vertex graphs.
An interesting question now arises. If we consider all -vertex graphs, there are potentially such graphs (each edge can either appear or be absent from a graph). How many "different" (non-isomorphic) graphs can there be? In particular, how many equivalence classes are there with respect to the relation ? For instance, when , there are potential graphs but only non-isomorphic graphs.
We will see that the number of -vertex non-isomorphic graphs (denoted by ) is not significantly less than .
The upper bound was already discussed. To prove the lower bound, let be the equivalence classes of . We use again the accounting method. For each -vertex graph , if belongs to , graph "pays a coin" to . The total number of coins paid in this process is exactly (why?). Each receives at most coins (there are bijections). Therefore,
To see why this number is not much different from , let us compare their exponents.
As for the other number,
When goes to infinite, both numbers are "roughly" .
An automorphism of is any isomorphism between and (itself), i.e., a bijection such that if and only if . A graph is called asymmetric if its only automorphism is the identity map. Prove that there are no asymmetric graphs with vertices.